|
Metadata/catalogue descriptions
Level of detail
The HOTBED system is being developed with a view to as long and full a life as possible. Therefore it may be appropriate to include fields now which can be used at a future date. For example, key signatures or tune collections could be possible student projects. The system can have layers of information depending on what is relevant and available for any given item. All fields do not need to be completed for any one record. Also all fields do not need to be completed for similar things – it is possible to include keys for some tunes but not all tunes.
The project has no designated researcher. It is hoped to develop an ethos whereby the system is open to development. HOTBED will be dependent on information contributed by tutors. Materials such as transcriptions can be scanned into the system but there is no resource available to create transcription.
[K Marshalsay would like to see a system whereby any user can fill in a basic "form" (which would include automatically generated name and date fields and a box for additional information) and send to HOTBED for review and possible inclusion in the system.]
Consideration was given to introducing a two tier display system providing a short entry record and a full record. As HOTBED is primarily for use by performance students, the detail included should be what tutors pass on to students (depending on genre, title, composer, key, time signature). It was agreed that as we had to decide between quantity and richness of description, we would include as much sound material as possible but described in less detail. This will permit Karen’s efforts to be targetted into learning and teaching and bought in resource to input metadata.
There is a need for a more formal method of obtaining subject specific advice and input as and when required for specialist metadata questions.
It was also noted that a small metadata group be established with membership including Karen Marshalsay, Cathlin Macaulay and an external specialist to advise on metadata issues.
Key Signatures
It was generally considered unnecessary for key signatures to be included for songs. They should be provided for tunes, where applicable and/or available.
Transcriptions
It was agreed transcriptions should be entered into HOTBED where available. Many are already available in TOCHER and from other sources. It was decided that HOTBED should try to provide transcriptions of as many different versions of the same item as possible to allow comparative study by students. It was also suggested that in some cases a basic skeletal transcription would be appropriate while in others it may also be desirable to have a fuller transcription of the performer’s actual rendition of the piece. The HOTBED ethos should be to provide the students with as many choices as possible. Implementing a format similar to Sibelius could also be considered in the longer term.
Song
Defining song categories was considered to be complex. It was suggested broad categories would be helpful and to use the classifications already in use within the Department of Celtic and Scottish Studies. Tune types and song types should be classified separately. Transcriptions and translations of lyrics was considered necessary.
Accompanying Instruments
The lack of material relating to accompanying instruments, particularly piano and harp, was noted. It was felt that HOTBED needs to have materials added to it directly relating to this important field of study of the course. The use of video was mentioned in this regard.
|